User talk:Jaibe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi, welcome to my talk page. I just figured this out --Jaibe 12:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip on signatures a while ago. I'm removing the tip from my page. If for some reason you want a record that you made the helpful suggestion, I'll add it back, but to my talk page. Dvd Avins 03:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for policing my user page. I appreciate it. Bwabes 03:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Embodiment
Due to a series of poor edits, This page has ended up with the scurf of wikipedia on dead-end pages. As you were one of the last people to make a rational edit of this page, Could you make a revert back to something reasonable (probably your own last edit) MNewnham 22:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stuff I mean to work on one day
- Tonkean macaque
- agent-based modelling (see mathematical biology). Wow, swarming has video!
[edit] Polly (robot)
Hi. The article mainly describes a robotic application of computer vision, the Polly robot. The article says very little about the Polly algorithm in terms of what it actually does and how.
Some comments:
- Don't see the recategorization as a "degradation". I only did it because it believe that (maybe incorrectly?) it fits the Application subcategory and that it should be better to have an article in a more specific category than a general one.
- I agree that it appears like a stub, and there is also a subcategory for stubs in the CV category.
- If you belive that the recategorization is incorrect, you should revert it. You know more about the article content than I do.
The computer vision stub category dissapeard just a few days ago. Apparently someone thought that it was redundant since there are more general stub classes, removed it, and put the articles in that category into the "Computer science stubs" category. --KYN 08:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SFD
I've replied to your comment on that page. Alai 02:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Abechdel.jpg)
Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Current thingy"
You're welcome, but to be fair I only thought to change it after I saw Fritz Saalfeld do it on the Fun Home page, so he should get the credit. :) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 08:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fireworks
Yeah, I could have checked the history, but I was feeling lazy. :) I've looked at it now — and I think that if we can find a source for Bechdel meeting Rubin in Burlington in 1992, we should put it back in (with the proper citation, of course). I expect that this is an attempt to say, "now that the relationship is over, I'm not part of her public life any more", but sadly I don't think it works that way. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Invitation.
Hello, I saw your edit to Timeline of same-sex marriage and would like to invite you to join WikiProject LGBT studies. We would be delighted to have you on board! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 02:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm thinking about it. I'm not sure about how I feel about the relationship between wikipedia and activism, although in general I strongly support each.--Jaibe 22:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't notice this reply on your talkpage. I would like to say that we're not trying to push a particular POV, and incitement to votestacking in XfDs is strongly discouraged. We're not here to "gay up the 'pedia", we're here to work together to create neutral, factual, comprehensive coverage of LGBT people and issues in a more vandalised section of Wikipedia. We've done a lot of stuff since I last contacted you, check us out. I would really love you to be part of what we're doing. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 11:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- OK! Whenever you want to join, we'll be here. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:StuartAdamson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StuartAdamson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shirley Jean Rickert
http://www.measuresup.com/default.htm had "Well, it's 2007 and I'm still hanging around." and "This page updated:Monday, February 05, 2007" yesterday, and when I checked again just now. Linking the 'as of' and leaving it at 2004 just didn't seem right. 76.22.4.86 23:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Faderhuset
Thanks. I am very quick to make changes. I do not worry about making big changes. In this case: (1) this is a small article that I expect few editors will read; (2) I am guessing it was posted by a Danish person to fill out the recent world-wide news about the riots; and (3) I know utterly nothing about the group. They could be trying to convert the unchurched, or they could just as easily be very conservative. I thought I would leave it alone, let it be ambiguous, rather then introduce an error. In the case where: [a] I think I know what was meant; OR [b] I expect editors to read the article frequently; I just go ahead and make the change. I am not at all shy.
Thanks again.
Nwbeeson 01:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
