Talk:James A. "Jim" Corbett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article seems to lack objectivity. It is very badly structured as well. Seems like to it has been plagiarized from some where. In my opinion it needs a re write.
- First of all, it hasn't been plagiarized. Check the source. Badly structured? It's chronological. Lack objectivity? Where exactly? The point of Wikipedia is to make changes yourself - if you feel it is POV, then make some changes. Don't like the structure? Then rewrite it. Sincerely, The author. :-)
