Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses and child sex abuse/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This information doesn't belong to wikipedia.
I think it is not apropriate to make notice of a couple of court cases and link them to one religion. Only in one case is the accusion made towards the society and that court case is still going on. This site should be totally removed.
This encyclopedia would not fit into this world if you start to write here about every court case to every single person and start to link them to the religion of the ones that are accused.
And are these people accused really a memmer of Jehovah's witnesses? There is 4 cases mentioned and in one it's said that Former elder "disfellowshipped" from congregation, convicted on sex charges. This has nothing to do wiht Jehovah's witnesses.
Are these information sources reliable? I am quite sure that they are hiding the truth in also other cases. Child abusers are can't simply be a Jehovah's witness becouse they are the only congrecation with strickt disfellowshipping system.
THIS PAGE SHOULD BE REMOVED! Cumulo 15:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
