Talk:Jerry Bruckheimer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group. | ||
"Subsequently, Bruckheimer moved to Los Angeles where he's remained ever since." contradicts "Bruckheimer has been married twice, and currently lives in Bloomfield, Kentucky." Something requires clarification, but I'm not knowlegable nor do I have any reliable Tjc 17:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Drop "where he's remained ever since" and the statement is no longer contradictory to what is said later.
"Bruckheimer has a Gulfstream Aerospace Gulfstream IV tail number N477JB."
I fail to see how this is interesting and worthy of being in the article. Is there some sort of humorous pun or something I am missing? Otherwise, that is like saying his license plate number is BX7-USJB
- Personally I find it an interesting anecdote that Bruckheimer owns a Gulfstream IV. It is an indication of success and personality; one could deduce from this information that Bruckheimer is a wealthy chap who has little interest in environmental concerns. I am neutral on whether or not the tail number should be included in the article. T. J. Day 19:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
--List of Films--
I know he's done a lot more films than what's listed. Why are there so few?
"Most of Bruckheimer's films feature elaborate special effects, a thumping pop music soundtrack, simplistic plots, and highly telegenic if sometimes improbable cast members. As a result, his films are often a financial success while being critically panned."
Sounds like a personal vendetta. Citation?
I totally agree. I'm going to take it out if no one finds a refrence for it. If anyone else agrees take it out now or whenever. --Phil 07:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
