Talk:Joshua Sparling/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There is not a single primary source beyond Sparling to back up any of the claims being made in any of the sections of the article.
This is something merely being pushed by the right wing as fact without any secondary sourcing beyond the complainant.
It is completely irresponsible to include this entry as it stands.
Is it even within biographical grounds to do so? There is no sourcing for the claims and, as such, it would fall within ego posting.
It's pure propaganda as it stands right now.
