User:Kefalonia/Street Scholar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Street Scholar (talk • contribs)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

1 Statement of the dispute
- 1.1 Description
- 1.2 Evidence of disputed behavior
2 Yet another case of pov-warring
3 Response
4 Outside view
5 Discussion

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

[edit] Description

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}

[edit] Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

[edit] Yet another case of pov-warring

Because the following has been added to a public project page, I think it is only fair to also add it to other public pages:

Muhammad bin Qasim: Could you help me out on the Muhammad bin Qasim article? perhaps get the guild members to help out. Once you check the article out you'll know why I'm saying. Check the talk page. of the article.--Street Scholar ---- Islamic conquest of South Asia: Pro Hindu, Anti-Muslim article attention needed. --Street Scholar -- Yes, I have seen these articles before and they are very biased. I am glad that you and others are balancing them. I will help out when I get the time. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 00:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC) (see also Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Anonymous_editor#Talk_pages).

Street Scholar has done pov-warring/deletions in these and other articles. It therefore makes me wonder that he puts such comments on a public wikipedia page to encourage others to aid him in his pov-warring. South Asian articles that are related to Islam get very much vandalism. This ranges from deletions, pov-warring, vandalism, whitewashing, inserting false and unsourced claims, revisionism, apologism and much more. Just a note: the two articles mentioned above have always been if anything at least partly apologetic, very incomplete, etc. and in fact they are not without a pro-islamic bias, so Street Scholars comment is a bit ironic.

Street Scholar (talk • contribs) has made only about maybe 100 contributions until now, but they include a lot of pov-warring and deletions like here: Iconoclasm, Islamic conquest (many similar deletions by Street Scholar in this article), bin Qasim (many similar pov-warring by Street Scholar in this article). They also include personal attacks like this: "Can you stop editing the Bin-Qasim article, you clearly have no idea of what you're talking about...You clearly have lost your finger tip-grip on reality haven't you?" [1], and sexist remarks: side note: Well Hindu girls seem to like my nose as seen as though I've humped a few an I am dating one now..

[edit] Applicable policies

{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

[edit] Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

(sign with ~~~~)

[edit] Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../k/e/f/User%7EKefalonia_Street_Scholar_801f.html"