User talk:Kellen`

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Use my wikibooks user talk instead.

[edit] Ryan Avery

Because of your edits on the Captain Ahab article, I was hoping you would look at this article on Ryan Avery, and lend your comments on the corresponding AfD. Thanks! PT ^(s-s-s-s) 23:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Veganism

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For always being active on the vegan page, as well as the talk page about it. As well as for fixing it and expanding it; all good work! Iolakana 12:11, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Profanity on the Cyclo-cross bicycle page

thanks k. Will.law 05:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

oops sorry k. Will.law 14:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Google dontchaknow <3. Kellen ^T 15:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

k. got it. Will.law 06:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: User Page

yeah i forget where i got the inspiration for it. i know it was someone really awesome though. Will.law 15:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User Boxes

Thanks for fixing 'em dude! I spent a long time yesterday trying to do it myself but it was beyond my level. hotdiggitydogs 17:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Atheism

On the article of Atheism you removed content in Atheism and Intelligence without due reason or cause. According to the survey, higher education are more likely to be Atheists. Besides actually having a reference supporting it, it can be blatantly seen throughout the planet. --William Pembroke 21:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Xiner 22:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Agreed that my edit summary was not particularly helpful; however, the part that I removed was a half copy of another section which was improperly formatted and cited. Kellen ^T 08:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CSD

Hi Kellen, just pointing out that just because a redirect is not used doesn't qualify it for speedy deletion. You can try other methods to delete unused redirects, such as WP:RFD. —Mets501 (talk) 16:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

for your revert Fluffy999

[edit] Re:Nomenclator

I'll do what I can. If he keeps this up he will get sanctioned by the admins - I say we stay calm, revert with explanations, and report 3RR/civility violations when they happen. He already got blocked for 3RR last week, for what it's worth. I suspect he will resort to sockpuppetry during blocks. We should keep an eye on that as well. Cheers, Skinwalker 13:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on March 1, 2007 to Veganism

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 8 hours.

This block imposed with some reluctance; but please stick by the rules

William M. Connolley 09:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

;_; Kellen ^T 08:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ellipsis

I think that was an incorrect replacement, I will investigate further. I was going to suggest […] to show that the omission is editorial, but I have put the elided passaged into the text, it seems relevant. Rich Farmbrough, 13:40 2 March 2007 (GMT).

[edit] Discrimination in Veganism Article

I believe the health effects section in the veganism article is discriminatory toward vegans, and meant to cast them as nutritionally and sexually defective. This violated Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy. I have made aired my concerns in the talk page at the veganism article. Please feel free to comment. Abe Froman 16:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)