Talk:Kima, Keisha, and Pam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
minor edits are fine but some of the edits removed detailed and relevant information like producers and edits of the main tracklisting were unnecessary and not as aesthetically pleasing. If making an edit please give reasons. Thank you for the minor fixes though :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lukeahartley (talk • contribs).
- I fixed it up because 1] it looked like crap 2] it had absolutely horrid formatting (when has Infobox Album ever appeared between the opening paragraph and the track list?) and 3] the new version is more encyclopedic and more similar to other album articles.
- I took out the producers because we don't need all of them in the infobox, and I was gonna make a personnel section for it.
- And there's no need for a table in a track list unless it's actually that complex (see 4:21...The Day After). --Machchunk | make some noise at me 07:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
you could have been nicer about it, I agree, all were minor edits, I wasnt talking about the table for the tracklisting,(and I didnt draw it) i was talking about the formatting on the text. Anyway thanks for the edits ;) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lukeahartley (talk • contribs).
- Yeah, I could've. It's also pretty late though, and after doing all of that and seeing that that response, I just got too defensive. --Machchunk | make some noise at me 07:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
just changed up the tracklisting, see if you can hear me out, it looks a lot more pleasing to the eye. About the producer thing, I've seen loads of album pages with producers in the contact box, I think it looks neater, I mean what's the point in having a section for producers if you're just gonna use a list which doens't look half as good? :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lukeahartley (talk • contribs).
- Could you reword that last part? --Machchunk | make some noise at me 07:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
(reworded lol) I think personnell sections should be reserved for minor things like who played certain instruments, backing vocals, stuff like that. There are never really too many producers, in fact the box looks better the more producers it has in it imo. I was just saying the producer section on the box is there for a reason, it looks really bare with just "Various Artists". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lukeahartley (talk • contribs).
-
- Yeah, I know it's there's for a reason, but the Infobox is the bare minimum for information. After all, It's not like the Infobox needs to have every speck of information; that's what the rest of the article is for. But I get what you're saying, and I respect that. --Machchunk | make some noise at me 18:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh and with the ft. Featuring thing, I think featuring looks more professional as a standard (feat., ft. featuring are all used in R&B and hip hop) but as long as its in smaller font I think that's fine... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lukeahartley (talk • contribs).
