Talk:King's Gambit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article uses an excessive amount of weasel language. Please reference the various claims that this-or-that line "is considered" better or worse. --Malathion 23:54, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] New diagrams
I apply a new template of chess diagram according to inter-wiki chess project: [1]. Please read this and join the discussion. --Klin 08:21, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
This article needs some editing in terms of the way it is written.--Gagueci 21:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Contradiction
The article states in the introduction that "Black can obtain a reasonable position by relinquishing the extra pawn at a later time and consolidating defensively" and that "Black must decide whether or not to accept the gambit. Since White cannot easily regain the pawn if Black accepts, the King's Gambit Accepted is the most common." just under the "Variations" header. This looks contradictory. Does it make sense to win a pawn because if your chances of survival depend on losing it later? MJGR 09:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes; do you know anything about chess? 74.225.130.13 21:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
