User talk:Kjd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Well, from here, here and here, I think it is obvious as can be. And maybe I am wrong, I'm not so sure anymore...—Vitriden 02:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
So, I've replied to you and you didn't reply to me. You've just asked these articles to be deleted, without listening to the arguments. That makes me feel like an idiot, you know.--Vitriden 03:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I have written a long answer and then accidentaly deleted it, so I'm not in the best mood right now. Shortly, on the CcTLD#ccTLDs_not_in_ISO_3166-1, there is not a single exception to the rule, so, since SP and ME are anounced to be alpha-2 codes for Serbia and Montenegro, really can't see how can anyone discuss anything in Montenegro on the issue.--Vitriden 13:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] WP:CSD
You nominated .sp for speedy deletion, the criteria that you put as your reason for deletion are not speedy criteria. I deleted under CSD A7. I hope this helps you for future tagging! Cheers!!! —— Eagle (ask me for help) 02:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] QF @ LAX
It is long-established consensus of Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports members that we do not list techstops or "illegal" destinations that cannot be purchased. It is not even a "domestic ticketing" policy - doesn't matter where you're from, you can't buy a ticket on Qantas to fly from LAX to JFK. They won't let you do it. As for it being on departure boards, that's rather irrelevant. We don't list many destinations that are shown on departure boards, such as domestic through-hub direct services. If you'd like to discuss changing our current consensus, I suggest you start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports. Thanks. FCYTravis 00:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RNIDS (.rs ccTLD)
You have an answer at Talk:.rs --Stevanb 22:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Duncraig
Thanks for your contribution. Any ideas what could be photographed in Duncraig that could provide a representative shot of the suburb? These residential suburbs are always a challenge. Orderinchaos78 20:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vrsn-end-of-zone-marker-dummy-record.root
In what way do you consider the listing of the response to a DNS query of this "domain name" to be nonsense? That's what is returned in the text (at least with certain server/client combinations, including mine) when you dig or nslookup the name. The return text may seem nonsensical, but the fact that it exists isn't. That section of the entry needed serious cleanup, but neither does that make it nonsense. Paul.w.bennett 18:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
