User talk:Knicholls
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Some Advise
Mr. Knicholls , i suggest you adopt similar standards for all articles in wikipedia, its really strange that you decided to revert the article on brahmins to an earlier date, because i added the names of some notable brahmins, but why is not the same thing applied to articles about kammas', kapus' etc. Did you not see them or did you choose to ignore them??? i reverted the article on brahmins back to my previous edit and would not mind even if it is removed only if you remove all such similar articles.
Keep this in mind:you are not the sole custodian of wikipedia, do something useful, try to contribute something useful instead of wasting your time correcting other people—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lookuman (talk • contribs) .
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Johnson Elementary, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Johnson Elementary. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Frankie 04:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism warnings
Thanks for reporting vandalism at WP:AIV. However, please don't use the {{test5}} template, as that produces a "You have been blocked" message. (Since you can't block users, you shouldn't use that template.) Depending on the severity of the vandalism and whether the person is a repeat offender, you can use {{test1}}, {{test2}}, {{test3}}, or {{test4}}. Also, please sbst the templates. Thanks. Thatcher131 18:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks 4 th'Diligence
That was some great cleanup you did on the Criticism section of the Zune page. I'm often discouraged by the "slash and hack first,.. contribute later" policies of most edits. I may not fully understand the standards of a criticism section, but the logical part of me exepects to see a summary of things criticised, and references to critics (of note)... you made it so, and I appreciate the diligence. [original "criticism" contributor]
