User talk:Kuasol1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Kuasol1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 19:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome Kausol1 and thanks for the help on Anna Eshoo
Kuasol1, Thanks for pointing that out, it has now been corrected. Please sign with 4 ~ at the end of your posting in the future. Thanks again.TalkAboutTalkAboutTalkAbout 15:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Futhermore, if you go to Tom Campbell's page by clicking his name it says his Tom Lantos next held this seat. Your best source is the Almanac of American Politics" which has the most clear and comprehensive information in one book.Kuasol1 05:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits to Hagop Kazazian
I hope the following may help you in WP in general and with your edits in Hagop Kazazian Pasha in particular:
- Format of referencing: Please learn about how to cite from WP:CITE. Use of Wikipedia:Citation_templates (the current status in Hagop Kazazian Pasha) is greatly preferred. Just providing a website in parantheses as you have recently done is not in good Wikipedia style. Please put these in the correct format.
- Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source. Neither are copies of Wikipedia, which unfortunately answers.com is. Thus, your edit gives an unreliable source and is not acceptable within WP rules.
- Sources must be reliable. This policy is explained in: Wikipedia:Attribution. A reference given from the publishing arm of the Armenian Revolutionary Foundation, and which, further, is a transcription of a speech given by someone unknown and which is laced with gems such as "ignorant, uneducated Turk" should not be used as citations of fact. This is in reference to your edit. Please note that such a reference might be acceptable in other situations, for example, as an illustration of a viewpoint.
- Again regarding your edit about a reference to the millet system, I had explained, both in my edit history and on the talk page that what I had requested a citation for was Kazazian being Catholic. Please see Talk:Hagop_Kazazian_Pasha for my reasons in doubting this.
Regards, --Free smyrnan 08:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
