User talk:Lamename3000/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

test... Lamename3000 03:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ENE dispute

What does merging the Internet Channel have to do with me being "Radical"? Have you ever read "be bold"? Also, just curious, but isn't it a bit strange to comment on my temper, and then go on to praise someone who called someone a "worthless Wikipedian"? ENE became disruptive over a non-issue. Just because you didn't like my legitimate actions in a completely unrelated issue does not mean that I am at fault at any point in this discussion. Now, do you have an actual reason why I am "continuously at fault" (and no, irrelevant personal opinion of legitimate edits do not qualify)? - A Link to the Past (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I am so sorry that I have offended you. Please accept my apologies. No one's perfect, neither is ENE, and no one is a worthless Wikipedian. I know that I am in no way a wikipedia editor, I make a few edits only when very necessary in my opinion. I guess I was trying to force that thought process on others. The only advice I can give you, is before you make edits that affect a whole article or a lot of the article, talk it out with others, first. That's all. Again, please accept my apologies if I offended you. There is nothing wrong with being bold, but Wikipedia is based a lot on community, and it's not right to try to undermine that community. Lamename3000 21:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey, Link? I take back my apology. You deserve any criticism you get. Lamename3000 05:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ALttP Deleted ENE's message to me?!?

How DARE you delete stuff on MY talk page... YOU do not have jurisdiction on MY talk page. I will delete WHATEVER I want on my talk page WHENEVER I want to. I almost missed what ENE had to say.

I will repost it.Lamename3000 05:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

If it violates policy, it gets deleted. The statement was not civil, and can be seen as harassment for continuing to spread claims about another Wikipedian behind his back. I must ask you to be civil as well. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, let me make that decision if it's on MY talk page, ok? After I'm done reading my talk page, I'll decide what I do with the content. Thank you very much for understanding >:) Lamename3000 05:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi!

- - Hi Stephen! I was glad to recieve your message. Encouragement from fellow Wikipedians is always appreciated. You'll notice that the particular user in question has been Wikistalking me, which is why he plopped down his own response before I had gotten a chance to. ALTTP is, honestly, one of the most difficult Wikipedians to work with, mostly because it's so damn DIFFICULT to ever actually try to have a rational discussion with him. He'll drag ANY discussion or dispute ON AND ON AND ON AND ON until you finally get so absolutely sick of it that you'll leave in disgust. Note his talk page- time after time after time after time. Just LOOK at the angry responses he evokes. - - "I was just ticked because its my second run-in with you. The MySims incident was outdated information and slight bit of rudeness on my part, but in the settlement that followed, I ended with a relatively polite {{[cquote|Good, but I'm not going to accept it on the Wikipedia page without a reference.}} But you weren't done and shot back with one more thing left me particulary incensed..." - - "I have undone your merge of those three Zelda articles, as the merger was clearly contentious and was not discussed. Please start a merge proposal. You may wish to get input from other editors at WikiProject Zelda. I see from your talk page that this is not the first undiscussed merge you've made lately." - - "I'm a little peeved at your hasty merge of Stop 'N' Swop. I'm not pissed about the article getting merged — I'm pissed at how poor a job you did at merging the article. You did not deal with the double redirects, you did not remove looping links in the target article, you failed to tag the redirect as a merge, you didn't add a references section to the target article... If this is how you normally merge articles, let me be the first to tell you that you aren't helping" - - And those are just a SAMPLING of the provokation this user has drawn out from Wikipedia's established, normally very calm and tactful users. Don't let him discourage you- and may I say to you... keep up the good work on your end too. :D Ex-Nintendo Employee 16:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)