Talk:Lara Flynn Boyle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
What about her suffering from an eating disorder? Or is that all speculation? I ask.137.73.160.86 21:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Boyle became a known actress for Twin Peaks, but the article says she got her "big break" in "The Practice?" What does that mean? Steve-O
I'm editing this to fix that; obviously this article was written by someone who had relatively little knowledge of Ms. Boyle's career. Daydream believer2 06:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
I can understand that some people might be excited by the 'anal bleaching article'[1], however this doesn't change the fact that there is no room for a gossip of this kind in an ecyclopedia. Also the existence of a source doesn't automaticaly imply the necessity to include it's content here. I would suggest those continualy reverting this issue to concentrate their energies on something more usefull. Jurohi 01:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the rumour regarding Flynn Boyle is notable and worthy of mentioning in the article. There are many mentions of it on the web (Googling for "lara flynn boyle" "anal bleaching" gives 672 hits, "lara flynn boyle" "anus bleaching" - 581, "lara flynn boyle" "anus bleached" - 1,520). Compare the rumour to that of the Richard Gere 'gerbil story', which (despite being completely false) gets a mention in his article. The anal bleaching comment has an actual, verified source and unlike the example above is more than just a piece of netlore.
- I will re-word the sentence in question in order to make it clear that Flynn Boyle has neither confirmed, nor denied the reports - but I would kindly ask you to read Wikipedia:Civility, as your comments strike me as rather confrontational. --Kurt Shaped Box 00:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- Aparently you missed the point: I am not questioning whether the fact is true or not, ie it may be true, but still I believe it is not conform with Wikipedia philosophy. See Category:Living people. Jurohi 00:08, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Odd statement without source
Someone thinks that this is suitable for inclusion:
- She apparently has had her right areola bleached.
Whilst it is marginally preferable to the previous version—which referred to her anus—there is still no source for such a statement: I have therefore moved it here just on the off-chance that someone might come up with a source (because you never know). HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 09:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] where'd she grow up?
Inner city working-class Chicago? What happened to the (substantial) amount of her childhood spent in relatively-rural Wisconsin more than a hundred miles from Chicago's city limits...? 69.219.146.25 03:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Needing Photo
this article needs a photo of the actress. Does anybody have a non-copyrighted photo (probably from cover of a magazine)?--Pejman47 18:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The current photo is from the Vanity Fair photoshoot, but a scan of the actual photo I won in an auction. I am not quite sure of the legalities with it, which is why I left it unsure, but hopefully it will be alright.--Lightingale 19:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
So, why exactly was the image removed with no explanation by a person no longer a member? Just wondering. Thank you.
