Talk:Large capacity magazine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Cleanup
This page appears to use the description of a large capacity magazine in almost a sarcastic way. In my opinion it is very biased to one side of the issue.
Quotes like: "Thus a magazine made prior to the 1994 ban and holding 12 rounds of ammunition is deemed dangerous, while its post-ban counterpart which holds 10 rounds is completely safe." are disingenuous. I've seen no evidence that people who support such magazine size restrictions would consider 10 rounds a magic cut off with larger sizes a public danger while smaller is "completely safe".
This article should be cleaned up to describe what a large capacity magazine is and explain the controversy from both points of view rather than just one.
A link to "Gun Politics" would also go a long way in helping make this NPOV.
Aecarol 16:34, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Not a Wiktionary candidate
This is just a concatenation of the three words "large", "capacity", and "magazine". And note that the article as it stands isn't a dictionary article describing a phrase, but is an encyclopaedia article actually describing large capacity magazines the things. Aecarol makes a suggestion for expansion above, note. Uncle G 22:38, 2005 Mar 27 (UTC)
