User talk:Larryjhs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A tag has been placed on Steve Brook, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 02:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding that deleted article
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
Providing an edit summary might make it more likely that you will get a reply. Just be civil. Will (Talk - contribs) 07:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Steve Brook
I've restored this page and changed it from a speedy deletion candidate to a production deletion candidate, please see the tag on the page. If you feel the page meets the requirements you can remove that tag. I've notified the original nominator of the restoral, and they can still bring the page to our deletion discussion area if they feel that notabilty is not being asserted. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 16:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Emek Refaim
Nice job at Emek Refaim - you really did some great (and well-needed) work there. If you can, try to format it so it conforms to the Wikipedia Manual of Style. I'll pitch in if I get a chance. Best, DLandTALK 05:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
