Template talk:Lego
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Awesome job AMK152 on this template. Could use a little better formatting, but I'm no expert... Agian, nice job. -ReuvenkT C E 04:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will be trying to improve the format soon. -AMK152 12:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Very nice template
... but I question the use of the LEGO logo, which is a copyrighted logo. Under fair use guidelines, this usage may not qualify as it is on articles which are not directly related to the company itself. ++Lar: t/c 12:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Technic
I'm surprised Technic isn't linked to on this template. Personally, I would replace the Pneumatics link with Technic, since to my mind, pneumatics is a subset. Any thoughts? Hertzsprung 13:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lego House
Does the "Lego House" link to Skanskaskrapan really belong on this template as its not actaully anything to do with lego.... --Dean Earley 21:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- I guess not, someone removed it while I was adding this comment.. :o) --Dean Earley 21:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Modulex
Why was Modulex removed?