User talk:Leotohill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] .NET Framework
I don't understand why a person describing himself as knowing "something about .NET" would remove a valid and documented fact that intermediate language code that is JITted is sometimes faster than native one. Deity complex? This just enforces the notion that Wikipedia is not a source of real information, just somme hearsay and biased opinions.
-
- No need to get personal, or bummed about WP. This is the process. I thought I was improving the article. If I contemplate other changes on this point, I'll bring it up on the discussion page first.
Leotohill 14:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Comments on Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
Hey there. Noticed that you made some comments previously on Talk:Self-fulfilling prophecy. Was wondering if you might drop into there again and give your view on the definition of what it should be. Seems that we have a loggerheads with myself and User:Ritchy and it would be good to get another opinion. Thanks Enigmatical 02:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] .NET Framework
I have reworded your critisism of it, as somebody deleted your comment. I believe some that all views should be expressed on wikipedia, provided they are valid. bruce89 16:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge tag
It was up to the remover to discuss what she did before removing the tag. I have nothing against removing it but i had to revert something done unilaterally. Cheers -- Szvest 14:36, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Roomba accuracy tag
I notice that you placed an accuracy tag on the roomba article. At the same time you removed a sentence that made a claim. Were you disputing just that sentence? In any case, I can find no discussion of the accuracy issue, so I'm inclined to remove the tag. I'll wait a decent interval before doing so. Leotohill 04:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry about the ambiguity; I've clarified on Talk:Roomba. -- Beland 15:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
