Talk:Lions Gate Entertainment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian TV shows, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canadian TV shows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
| This article is part of WikiProject Vancouver, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area. To participate, edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |  |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | |
| If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. |
Hasnt Lions Gate just taken over a UK opperation? if so which company?DJ HEAVEN 14:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
I don't think that the Tyler Perry block at the bottom of the page is necessary. I understand Perrys association with Lionsgate, but why not then include Michael Moore, Nicholas Cage, etc. I won't remove it but maybe it can be discussed here.
Contents |
[edit] From Talk:Lions Gate Films
Merge them.
Totally do it, makes sense since LG Entertainment is both a distribution and production company Cornell Rockey 02:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Merger with LGE
Object. The two articles should not be merged. Lions Gate Entertaiment is a parent company, Lions Gate films is a subsidiary. We don't merge NBC or Universal Pictures into NBC Universal; we do not merge Paramount Pictures into Viacom; we do not merge MGM, Columbia Pictures or United Artists into Sony Pictures Entertainment; therefore we should not merge Lions Gate Films into Lions Gate Entertainment. - Davodd 22:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- I agree – (empoor) 13:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Seconded. It'll be too confusing to put them in the same box. Crosslink, of course, but not merge. ErisRaven 06:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lions Gate is now Lionsgate
The company has officially changed the name of all its divisions to Lionsgate, hence no more "Lions Gate Films," "Lions Gate Music," etc. All relevant articles should be updated to reflect the new name.
- The official company name still stays the same (Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation), so only the brand name has been changed to Lionsgate [1] – (empoor) 00:52, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- Please correct this. They really operate under Lionsgate now – (empoor) 11:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mentioning on Ultimate Avengers
Both These direct to DVD Animated Features were produced by lionsgate home entertainment. This could be mentioned in the section for Home Video. Would it ok for it to be mentioned in the article? Or better yet, in the Home Entertainment link articleNathen
[edit] Based in what?
I'm confused—is Lionsgate Canadian or American? --(trogga) 22:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
