Talk:List of S&P 500 companies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Naming convention for Companies and Businesses
I just wanted to draw attention and comment to on a draft poll to determine naming convention for companies and businesses. I have looked around a number of places and have only seen comments to the effect of "we should have a convention" or "do we have a convention" on how to name a XXX company. This has either the effect of drawing a few uninterested comments or a stirring up a heated debate. In either case the net result is generally zero. Your comments to help clarify this poll and later corresponding vote would be greatly appreciated. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 17:58, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies)/poll
Voting has begun and will continue until March 5. Please resolve this lagging issue. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 22:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please do not edit text of listing.
Please do not edit the text of the listing. This is the list as it comes from S&P. Please make redirects for companies better known by other names instead of editing their listing. This enables easier updates from the S&P list. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo 00:49, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Updating category
There is also a category (Category:S&P 500). Is there any desire to keep that synced with this list? -- Bovineone 06:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Current list of missing articles for S&P 500 companies
Updated 6 March 2007:
Company | Ticker symbol | SEC filings | Industry |
---|---|---|---|
Applera Corp-Applied Biosystems Group | ABI | reports | Life Sciences Tools & Services |
Archstone-Smith Trust | ASN | reports | Residential REITs |
BJ Services | BJS | reports | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
Bard (C.R.) Inc. | BCR | reports | Health Care Equipment |
Century Telephone | CTL | reports | Integrated Telecommunication Services |
Equity Residential | EQR | reports | Residential REITs |
Hudson City Bancorp | HCBK | reports | Thrifts & Mortgage Finance |
Kimco Realty | KIM | reports | Retail REITs |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holding | LH | reports | Health Care Services |
Millipore Corp. | MIL | reports | Life Sciences Tools & Services |
Noble Corporation | NE | reports | Oil & Gas Drilling |
Pinnacle West Capital | PNW | reports | Electric Utilities |
Questar Corp. | STR | reports | Gas Utilities |
Spectra Energy Corp. | SE | reports | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
Zions Bancorp | ZION | reports | Regional Banks |
- ^ Standard & Poor - Indices S&P 500 (Excel). Standard & Poor's (2007-03-01). Retrieved on 2007-03-04.
--A. B. (talk) 15:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 5 March 2007 changes + issues to consider
Yesterday, I replaced the existing list with the 1 March 2007 list of S&P 500 constituents from the Standard and Poor's website. While I was at it, I also added ticker symbols, each company's industry (as listed by S&P) and links to each company's filings at www.sec.gov. I created new redirects for companies whose article names did not match the names S&P used. I also made sure each company was listed in Category:S&P 500.
The convention observed previously with this article has been to use exactly the S&P nomenclature, which I have done, however I think we may want to rethink a few:
- Companies with "(New)" in their listing such as Fluor Corp. (New)
- Companies with a specific class of stock in their listing such as Dynegy Inc. (New) Class A and Scripps (E. W.) 'A'
- S&P's list is more precisely a list of equity securities, while this list is of companies
Perhaps these types of situations might be best handled with footnotes, for example:
- Fluor Corp.[1]
- 1 Fluor Corporation was listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:FLR) in 1957 and later acquired. In 2000, Fluor was spun out of Massey Energy and the "new" Fluor Corporation was relisted on the NYSE.
- Scripps (E. W.)[2]
- 2 Scripps has two classes of common stock, "Voting shares" and "Class A". Class A shares are used in S&P 500 index calculations
What do others think? (And does anyone have any problems with the expanded information I added yesterday?) --A. B. (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- In the past, I had truncated the "(New)" where it was listed. I also removed the "class A" where I was able to find it. The footnotes would be fine with me, but may be hard to maintain as the S&P list gets updated in the future. I don't see anything wrong with the expanded info, the update looks good to me. Thanks for your work. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)