Talk:List of banks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Didn't linkify Halifax, as none of the articles in the disambiguator are right. If it was linked, people may assume the article is there when it isn't. Not sure about this. Anyone? Kirun 23:06 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)
I moved all Puerto Rican banks into the United States category; Puerto Rico is a United States Commonwealth, not an independent country. To compensate, I added which state/territory/whatever the main HQ of the bank was located in.
- Puerto Rico is an unincorporated territory of the United States. — Instantnood 08:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Banks in India require a special categorization, at least two, namely, nationalized banks (major equity owned by the Government of India), and private sector banks. India also has several other types of Banks, but to begin with these two categorization should serve the purpose.
I also find that the word "publicly owned" requires clarification - in India "publicly owned" means owned by the Government, where this phrase generally conveys the meaning that the entity is a corporate body with equity held by the general public, and conveys a sense of private ownership. In view of this, for a wider audience, the categorization of Banks in India should be done at least under two sections: 1) Nationalized Banks, and 2) Private Banks.
Accordingly, I am re-arranging the names of Banks of India, and suitably modifying the factual information, wherever required. --Bhadani 3 July 2005 03:22 (UTC)
-
- Does the words "publicly owned" have been used in the sense that the Bank concerend has since issued euqity to the public? I will study the classification in that light also.--Bhadani 3 July 2005 03:32 (UTC)
- I am re-arranging the names of the Banks in India as above.--Bhadani 6 July 2005 14:41 (UTC)
- Does the words "publicly owned" have been used in the sense that the Bank concerend has since issued euqity to the public? I will study the classification in that light also.--Bhadani 3 July 2005 03:32 (UTC)
[edit] Recent edits by user:Alanmak..
Regarding [1] [2] [3] - User:Alanmak has ignored the fact that even though Taiwan is dictated by the official Wikipedia NPOV policy for Chinese-related topics that it should not be used synonymously with the modern state/régime/government/polity of Republic of China, for the purpose of listing it's generally agreed upon that it should be listed under #T. The underlying rationale is that most readers would be looking for it by its common (but not entirely official) short name. A hyperlink from #C is already adequate to help readers locate it.
As for Hong Kong, he has effectively disregarded the constitutional status of special administrative region with respect to the administrative division hierarchy of the People's Republic of China (PRC) (Cf. Articles 30 and 31 of the 1982 Constitution of the PRC). In his edits he has kept asserting his point of view that special administrative regions are ordinary subnational entities, comparable to provinces or equivalence of the PRC. He's also over-did that reordering of the banks according to alphabetical order was also reverted. — Instantnood 08:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
