Talk:List of collaborative software
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There already is list of wiki software and it is long. I don't think it is worthwhile to list wikis here again. -Hapsiainen 12:53, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
- I think I agree. Perhaps we could just link to the List of wiki software from this article in the appropriate spot and remove those particular links? — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 13:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
-
- Done. -Hapsiainen 14:49, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
Since when is Interwoven free or open source? (under product list for web based solutions). -Mimi 12:49, Dec 20, 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Gobby
I think Gobby deserves mention here, although I'm not sure which section it would go in. I haven't really seen anything else like it. 66.20.189.94 16:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Redundant links
Some links are redundant, I think it's good enough to have one project listed one time.
[edit] Sort Projects alphabetically
Projects are not sorted alphabetically, sorting makes reading better.
[edit] New software
Can i add new software to this list?
more details about the software can be found at http://www.collaber.com
Our software is as powerfull as Microsoft Groove.. So we think it must be included in the list.
Thanks Rajesh
[edit] Incorrect placement of some items
How can Microsoft Office Groove be Open Source / Free Software? In the corresponding article, it says it is proprietary. (Of course, I didn't even need to read the article to tell you that.)FSHero 16:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Open-Source's Top Billing
Why is open source software in its own category here, and one that dominates the list? Wouldn't it make more sense to organize it by functional domain, collaborative capabilities (Email/IM groupware vs. data visualization vs. screen sharing), or some other logical categorization? Categorizing by license type seems unhelpful. Sam 06:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
