Talk:Love at first sight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Can't resist some sarcasm. Wikipedia continues to take off and enter mainstream usage. But this article is missing. Blatant. Take you time. No hurry. Don't tell me to do it. I wouldn't know where to begin. Will Wikipedia ever use correct unpatronizing English? Will it ever be a reliable reference for psychological issues? If not, fork those articles to another site. Psychopedia.org? edited by real counsellors etc.
[edit] Examples from history
So, anyone going to finish this?
[edit] Meh
Okay considering that said event is unproven and actually defining love has been a life long( and somewhat fruitless) career for thousands of both amateur and professional philosphers (poets, etc) maybe there needs to be alot more use of the word "supposedly" in this article or some similar edit, or maybe just delete the whole thing Eno-Etile 06:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. The article incorrectly assumes that the phenomenon exists. -205.153.156.221 01:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Uncited
I can't believe this article doesn't cite a single article! It is far, far from encyclopedic. Can someone fix this?--Thomas.macmillan 06:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
