Talk:M1941 Johnson rifle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
it looks like you took the entire artical straight out of world.guns.ru
we need more info then that... also that is called plagerism
[edit] You sure?
Is it possible world.guns.ru coppied the wikipedia article? I frequent world.guns.ru as it is a reliable source for details on many different types of fire arms. World.guns.ru has notoriously has notoriously bad english grammar and spelling. This article looks as if it might of originated on either website.
- I personally wrote a good portion of this article. The earliest version of this article appears to have been copied from Max's site, however it has been edited significantly since. The problem with saying it comes from Max's site is that that site relied heavily on books I've read translated into Russian and back into Englis. I don't agree that it's plagarized. Perhaps somebody can email Max Popenker at the email he provides on his web site if they have a concern? --Asams10 20:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article recreation
The "History" section of this article was a copyvio from the Web site [1]. Since the copyrighted text existed in every version, I deleted the page and recreated it without the copyvio text. So, someone will need to re-write the History section if it is wanted. --Aguerriero (talk) 20:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] To the Powers That Be
Somebody in charge let us know when we can once again add factual material to this article, which is ridiculously incomplete in its present form (and also, inaccurate). I have quite a bit of original, non-plagiarized, sourced, reference and factual material to add, but Heliac and Scienceman reverts and deletes all of it as soon as I add it (even though I am citing sources). -Tim 25 AUG 2006