User talk:M3taphysical

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Question 2 Image copyright problem with Image:DisarmamentProgram300.jpg 3 Image Tagging for Image:Wotj.jpg 4 Image Tagging Image:27pictoputonmap.jpg 5 Image copyright problem with Image:Williams photograph large.jpg 6 Re: Explicit author autorization on copyrighted material 7 Hei 8 Image copyright problem with Image:Gipsy_kings.jpg 9 ELECTROMATIC AfD 10 Diaphragm 11 Concordia Newsletter 11.1 Help out now! 11.2 Decision Making 12 Image:Gipsy kings.jpg 13 Mjosa 14 WikiProject France 15 Université de Montréal

[edit] Question

Hello there, I saw you posted on my talk page. Considering you seem to be quite open to newcomers, I'll just ask you my question right away: I've been doing research and have been editing an article on the Arms Industry - I used a picture that is copyrighted from Oxfam. I wasn't too sure about whether or not I would be allowed to actually use it, so I marked the copyright status as "uncomfirmed".

{{somewebsite}}

How do I change this? --Ludvig 17:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

It seems as if the image is copyrighted (its even stated on the picture itself) and unless the copyright holders explicitly release the copyright, or it falls into a certain blanket category, it can't be used. The image will be deleted (unless you can get written permission from the copyright holders). For further information, see Wikipedia:fair use and Image copyright tags. Hope that helps. Orane (t) (c) (e-mail) 17:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:DisarmamentProgram300.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DisarmamentProgram300.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Wotj.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wotj.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 20:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:27pictoputonmap.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:27pictoputonmap.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.98.101 09:27, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Williams photograph large.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Williams photograph large.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 17:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Explicit author autorization on copyrighted material

Hi, for material that we have been given permission to use FOR wikipedia ONLY, we need to use a fair use tag, combined with {{withpermission}}. There used to be a {{permission}} license tag, but as you can see it's now a speedy deletion criterea.

The thing is that Wikipedia is about creating free content that anyone can use as long as they abide by the GFDL license, therefore content that is only usable on Wikipedia itself is not allowed unless it also qualify as fair use. You can try asking for permission to release spesific (possebly low res) versions of images under a free license though, see Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission for tips on how to ask for the "proper" kind of permission. --Sherool (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hei

Velkommen til Wikipedia, selv om du har vært hær ganske lenge :) Fint å se att du skriver masse her, selv har jeg ikke gjort så mye på Wikipedia den siste tiden. Men for eksempel så sorterer jeg ut bilder som kommer uten lisens og kildeinformation, det er jo ganske viktig da. For eksempel bilden Image:27pictoputonmap.jpg som du har lastet opp er litt problematisk.. vi kan bare markere de som PD hvis vi snakket med artisten selv, eller finner en veldig tydlig lisenstekst på webbsiden. I dette fallet så fant jeg dette: [1] (teksten om copyright og gjenbruk lengst ned) -- hvilket betyr att det ikke går an. :(

Selv om det virker trist att vi ikke kan bruke så mye bilder så er det kanske ikke så merkelig. Det wikipedianerne har funnet ut er i prinsipp at hvis man vil ha en fri encyklopedi, må man bygge den selv, og det er ganske sant om bilder og illustrasjoner også. Selv liker jeg ikke engang fair use-bilder, men de må vi ibland akseptere. Men bilden på Mjøsa som du har lastet opp er veldig fin! ❝Sverdrup❞ 12:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Gipsy_kings.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gipsy_kings.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ELECTROMATIC AfD

Hey, you didn't list it on the AfD page! Don't worry, I have already done it for you and voted for deletion. --Neigel von Teighen 16:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, sorry, I completely forgot! Thanks for the help :D --Ludvig 16:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diaphragm

If you read the diaphragm article, you will see that the diaphragm rests against the pubic bone. That means the dome of the diaphragm covers all the surface next to the bladder, and the anterior rim rests against the urethra. Both images show how a cervical cap fits (covering only the cervix and not the vaginal wall); the top image might be better for cavity rim caps like Oves and Prentif that adhere directly to the cervix, the bottom image better for Vimule and FemCap which adhere to the vaginal walls immediately surrounding the cervix. Neither image shows how the diaphragm covers much of the vaginal wall, or how it can apply pressure to the urethra. The diaphragm image is badly made.

I intend to draw in a correctly placed diaphragm on a better image when I have time, but until then I believe the poorer-quality image is more accurate for the diaphragm article. Lyrl ^Talk _Contribs 01:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Concordia Newsletter

NEWSLETTER

Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.

[edit] Help out now!

• Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
• Give people the Civility Barnstar.
• Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
• Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
• Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.

We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.

[edit] Decision Making

The council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.

If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.

- Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.

[edit] Image:Gipsy kings.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gipsy kings.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 11:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mjosa

I'd argue that adding a (citation needed) is not normally a minor edit. Presumably the goal is to get the original author's attention; not all of us watch minor edits all the time. Williamborg (Bill) 04:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, I guess I won't use minor edits for (citation needed) anymore...--Ludvig 21:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject France

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 21:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Université de Montréal

Hello and thanks for the comment. I'm new here, so I need to learn how things work :) So, how do I put a source to material that isn't online, as I believe Maclean's University issue not to be?Dusis 16:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)