Talk:Macintosh Portable
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Macintosh. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as an article pertaining to Apple Computer, but is not currently working to improve it. WikiProject Macintosh itself is an attempt to improve, grow, standardize, and attain featured status for Wikipedia's articles related to Apple Macintosh and Apple Inc. We need all your help, so join in today! |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
was the screen really active matrix? I wrote it was passive because that was my recollection, but it was backed up by mention on one of the sites that I used to get some of the basic data from - trouble is, I forget which it was. The other thing is that the mouse cursor and fast graphics definitely DID suffer from "submarining", I remember seeing that first hand, so if it was active, it wasn't very good. In fact Apple introduced a special cursor trick which left short trails designed to help the user not lose sight it on this machine. Graham 03:54, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- I'm almost positive the early PowerBooks (and hence logically the Portable) had passive-matrix screens; can't remember when Apple made the switch though. - Hephaestos 04:02, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)
There were third-party portable macs very early on. They used surplus SE logic boards. Who made them? JesseVincent
- Outbound Computers theducks
In Response: The screen on the Portable was in fact an active matrix screen. In regards to the Powerbook, when Apple released the 100, 140, and 170 in October of 91, the 100 and 140s had passive matrix screen, while the 170 (the high class Powerbook, if you will) had the active matrix screen. (Source: Apple-History.com) -- Joey B.
