Talk:Mahmoud Khatami
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Muslim scholars article assessment section, a WikiProject related to the Muslim scholars. note:the project includes non-Muslim scholars. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Philosophy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy and the history of ideas. Please read the instructions and standards for writing and maintaining philosophy articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
[edit] What does "ontetic" mean?!
Or how can we use this term before its already confusing meaning has been given later in the article?!
[edit] Cleanup
This article needs a lot of cleaning up and wikifying. DrL 15:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
At this point, I'd settle for an occasional paragraph break. I tried, but gave up after my head started to hurt. RandyKaelber 21:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- I found this in Category:Wikify from September 2006. Well... I can see why it's remained there for so long! I've added some paragraphs in what I hope are appropriate places, and corrected some typos. My head hurts now, too. It makes me wonder if we can have too much information in a WP article? --Smalljim 13:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- I did a quick wikification job on it and removed the tag. Clean-up tag remains. The article is FAR too long. It should just give an introduction to his work, how he relates to other philosophers, to what makes him important and different. If people want more they will have to read the books. From the article as it stands I get that he is a very innovative and important thinker, a bridge between Islamic and Western philosophy, but I don't get any more because there is just too much to plough through. Itsmejudith 21:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
