From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Mallarme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- SoothingR^(pour) 12:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 Krishnamurti 2 Thanks 3 WikiProject Hinduism 4 Raja Yoga controversy 4.1 Your reminder 4.2 Wikispam

[edit] Krishnamurti

Thanks for pointing me to the Hungarian website. You are probably right about the postings there being copyright violations. I see that the reference to From Darkness to Light which I found listed at somewhere as the first volume of Collected Works (but with no other publication data) conflicts with the Hungarian site's listing of The Art of Listening as the first of the Collected Works. I will try to track that down. OK, evidently the "Volume one" was a user's inscription in a copy of Darkness to Light, and someone then entered it as part of the title at the Alibris.com site. --Blainster 19:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Hi, thank you for your edits to Kamashastra. It has been a very neglected article. --BorgQueen 17:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Hinduism

Welcome to the project! If need you need any help or have to ask something about the project you are always welcome to talk to me. Gizza^{Chat ©} 04:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Raja Yoga controversy

Dear Hinduism Project editors,

There is a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga. Please read the debate on the Hinduism discussion page. Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy. Thank you. HeBhagawan 15:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your reminder

Thanks for the reminder, however, I do not feel that I have violated AGF or CIVIL. Though I feel you have in some of your comments about Sandstein. However, I chose to assume good faith of you and instead ascribed it to a language issue rather than a deliberate attempt to disrupt his RfA. If you were to take the hypothetical path you mentioned and the page were deleted again, we would simply have to delete-protect the name. It really is not the way to deal with this issue. Sarah Ewart 13:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I do not have a problem with you having the article in your userspace as long as you do not use it to violate deletion policy. I was concerned when I first found it that you may try to repost it again, but I accept what you are saying and I believe that is not your intention. Cheers, Sarah Ewart 19:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikispam

Thanks for your comments and your defence of someone you feel has contributed. There is a very good argument about whether links put up under WP:COI should be removed automatically or checked (and I am sympathetic to the view no one should do a change to WP which makes an article worse, so they should be checked one by one, but often these people leave a very long list). People have different views on this.

However please do not think that Kh7 is all sweet and innocent: look through all her edits. Edits like [1] where she replaced a perfectly good link which her own link claiming that the link had "moved". It hadn't: she just didn't own the site she moved the link from. It is very hard to regard this kind of behaviour as a minor transgression by a beloved community member... it was naughty, and mean. --BozMo talk 23:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)