User talk:Maurice Carbonaro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Maurice Carbonaro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Michaelas10 (T|C) 14:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Brachialgia 2 Schools of philosophy 3 AfD:LinuxDC++ 4 Are You a Wikipediholic Test 5 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. 6 All work and no play makes Maurice a dull boy. 7 Notability of Hypertinence

[edit] Brachialgia

Thanks for the article, but it appears more like a dictionary definition - compare with Neuralgia for a complete encyclopædia article. Perhaps you might consider expanding the article, or adding dictionary definitions to Wikipedia's sister project, Wiktionary. Regards, Tonywalton  | Talk 11:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Schools of philosophy

Dear Maurice - are you working on this page as a complete list of all world philosophies, both secular and religious? Or does it have some boundaries such as Eastern/Western etc... ? Regards, GourangaUK 14:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Dear GourangaUK - The answer is yes. Because wikipedia is a global enciclopedia I think we owe it a global point of view, so I was thinking to a list of ALL world philosophies, both secular and religious, visualized in a a timetable that will give an idea of the advancement of world philosophy itself during time. Thanks if advance for any kind of contributions in thi sense. Regards. Maurice Carbonaro 07:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Maurice, thank you for clarifying this - I've added a few today. Ys, GourangaUK 14:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD:LinuxDC++

Hi, would you care to share your opinion/recommendation on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LinuxDC++? It's been "overthrown" by fanboys and needs some fresh eyes. Memmke 10:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Are You a Wikipediholic Test

Did you accidentally create this page in the main space of Wikipedia? I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Please try to be careful in creating new pages. If you're ever unsure about how to do something, just describe the problem and put {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come along to give you advice. --dm ^(talk) 08:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

This could be an interesting article, but it's in need of sources to back up what you're saying. Could you add some? (websites, books, newspapers) If you contact me afterwards, I'll worry about the formatting. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] All work and no play makes Maurice a dull boy.

[edit] Notability of Hypertinence

A tag has been placed on Hypertinence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. LittleOldMe 12:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to dump on you, but as an addendum to the above may I draw your attention to the guideline on neologisms. Regards LittleOldMe 12:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)