User talk:Maxt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Removal of links from disk encryption software
Hello, you recently removed a bunch of links from the 'disk encryption software' article, including an internal link to BestCrypt, with the message: "Removed spam links (i.e. sites offering commercial products or services -- even if there's "free trial"), which were against the guidelines.".
While I do not disagree with removal of excessive external links, as the author of the BestCrypt article, I would like to know which guideline you are referring to? The only relevant one I could find was WP:SPAM that, does not appear to mention anything like the criteria you specified, and certainly does not state anything relevant against internal links (canvassing does not apply since the particular link was very relevant to the article). I have re-added BestCrypt for now. -- intgr 17:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, you're right that an internal link justifies a link from another article. However, the BestCrypt entry on Wikipedia is already marked for possible deletion. "If notability cannot be established, the article is more likely to be considered for deletion, as per Wikipedia:Guide to deletion." Links to such a Wikipedia entry are potential spam too. Maxt 14:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Maxt
[edit] Trying to start edit war on disk encryption software
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cralar (talk • contribs).
[edit] Who is Adm30?
Hello, I have noted that the user Adm30 (talk • contribs) has recently begun editing Talk:Disk encryption software as well as the article itself. Do you know who he is? I really hope he is not a sock puppet or meat puppet, but as he has registered today, has made many edits to that article, and appears to reiterate your arguments in addition to having a somewhat similar editing style, it does not seem like an unreasonable suspicion as per the policy at this point. I'm giving you a chance to refute this without proceeding with the official guidelines. -- intgr 18:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that following the results of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Maxt, Adm30 (talk • contribs) has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of this account. Please see WP:SOCK, and avoid any abusive use of sockpuppets in the future, or you may find yourself blocked without further warning. Thank you. Luna Santin 10:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Leaving Wikipedia
Hello, just wondering... Should I feel guilty for you leaving Wikipedia? Have a nice day. -- intgr 15:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
