Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-02-09 Natural law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | ||||||||||||
|
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2007-02-09 Natural law
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.
[edit] Request Information
- Where is the issue taking place?
- Natural law, Talk:Natural law
- Who's involved?
- Emote
- What's going on?
- I feel that user's edits are motivated by a desire obscure the origins of natural law theory in Stoic, and therefore pagan, philosophy, in order to bolster religious claims made about natural law; see our discussion on the talk page.
- What would you like to change about that?
- Because this is not a heavily monitored page, the conversation currently involves only the two of us. I feel that user may feel resentful that the only one talking about Wikipedia policy is me, which can make this seem like a personal attack. Some support — or correction, if I'm the one who's mistaken — of the sorts of edits that do and do not violate NPOV and NOR would be very helpful.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- I think this is best resolved in the open.
[edit] Mediator response
Is this case still active or can I close it? --Ideogram 01:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll take it up. --Mechcozmo 01:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nevermind, it would seem that a compromise has been reached and this case can be closed. --Mechcozmo 01:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
"pagan asscociation with" rather than "pagan origins"
"prevalence of natural law theories in pre-Christian society/philosophy" -- This would indicate that the idea existed before Christianity, but not give pre-Christian societies sole credit for the creation and development of the theory.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.
