Michael Allen Williams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please discuss this issue on the talk page or replace this tag with a more specific message. This article has been tagged since December 2005. |
Michael Allen Williams is the author of Rethinking "Gnosticism": An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category, 1999, ISBN 0-691-00542-7
This work is one of the first critical works that goes about comparing the established academic definition(s) of gnosticism to the now acquired Nag Hammadi texts. The main points of the book are;
- that there is no established definition of "gnosticism" by people who use the term, let alone the academic world &
- that the groups referred to as "gnostic" by the Christian church apologists referred to themselves often by their leader or leaders' names but no group referred to themselves as "gnostic" or "gnostics".
Also, Williams mentions the argument that none of the groups labeled "gnostic" shared a common set of beliefs that put them in a group together. The only things close to this would be the Christian heresiographical use of referring to these varied groups as "gnostics". As well as the varied set of interruptions of the creator of the material world (aka Yahweh or demiurge) by these early groups. Finally Williams clarifies that the ancient "gnosticism" of the Nag Hammadi groups and the misused "gnosticism" of moderns groups and academia have little if anything in common. Williams suggests a better and more adequate term for these hereticial groups would be "biblical demiurgical traditions".
