Talk:Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a controversial topic, which may be under dispute.
Please read this talk page and discuss substantial changes here before making them.
Make sure you supply full citations when adding information to highly controversial articles.

There is a dispute between two versions. To see the other version: [1], to compare: [2]. — Insta ntnood 05:17, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] PRC/Mainland

This is a government ministry post of the PRC. Which is why I have placed the article in the PRC category and moved it from the mainland China category. SchmuckyTheCat 01:42, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Jurisdiction of this ministry is only within the mainland. — Insta ntnood 03:27, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

- your mom has jurisdiction only in my pants. that is baloney, and i guess I have to add informtion about CEPA and An Min SchmuckyTheCat 04:47, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

CEPA is a bilateral agreement between two trade entities. — Insta ntnood 05:06, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

trilateral actually. across HK, the mainland, and Macau, which constitutes all of the PRC. SchmuckyTheCat 05:13, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No. There are two bilateral agreements, one between Hong Kong and the mainland, and the other between Macao and the mainland. — Insta ntnood 05:16, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

with the goal of integration of all three, the idea of which you cannot stand. If you're going to add controversy tags to edits you don't like, then so, what, exactly is the controversy. Please make a problem statement that other users might wish to comment on. SchmuckyTheCat 05:21, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The goal of CEPAs were to lift trade barriers. It was not agreements which Hong Kong's and Macao's trade departments give up their duty and transfer the power to the Ministry of Commerce of the PRC. — Insta ntnood 05:40, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)