User talk:MissKriss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A tag has been placed on Randy gill, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 01:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] BBRBR
I reviewed the content of your article which I deleted. I still don't think it is suitable for inclusion in our encyclopedia. I suggest reading our guideline on notability to see why I made this judgement. One possibility would be to userfy the information, which means it would be placed on a subpage of your user space. Let me know if you need any help in doing this and I will be pleased to help. Finally I'm sorry I had to delete your contribution. --Guinnog 14:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Radio
See WP:RADIO for information about editing articles relating to radio. --Teratornis 18:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reliable sources
Perhaps the biggest challenge for new editors on Wikipedia is understanding that we don't just write what we know, we write what we can verify by citing reliable sources. In everyday life, people learn things through experience, word-of-mouth, or by reading about them. We remember things, but often we forget exactly how we learned them. Most people do not remain consciously aware of how they know what they know. They remember the "what," and forget the "how." Writing on Wikipedia requires an extra level of discipline; we don't write anything and everything we know, but only what we can find reliable sources for. Therefore, the best approach to writing for Wikipedia is to start with some reliable sources, and write articles about what they contain. The vast majority of new editors take the opposite approach: they get an idea to write about something they know, and only later do they discover the need to find reliable sources for what they know. --Teratornis 18:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
