Talk:MIT Sloan School of Management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Should Walker really be pictured? Wouldn't E-52 be more appropriate, if uglier?
Article updated to reflect that Fiorina is no longer the most powerful woman in business. This is a title now owned by eBay Inc. Meg Whitman.
As it stands, the first paragraph sounds too much like braging, and not enough like an encyclopedia article. How about just stating facts? Like: sloan is a business school associated with MIT, several faculty members have won nobel prizes, these notable people went there...etc.
[edit] moving photo
the photos of Senior House is inappropriate for Sloan -- I'm moving it to Senior House where it belongs Theinfo 17:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC) The suggestion has been made to merge the Center for eBusiness into the page for the Sloan School of Management. Many MIT research center's and labs have their own entries. I'm unsure of the criteria for merging vs. have a stand alone page. If the stub is the issue, I'm happy to expand it during the course of the next few months.
[edit] "Institute Professor" nominated for deletion
The article titled Institute Professor has been nominated for deletion by user:Kane5187, who says not all of the 10-or-12-or-so Institute Professors are notable. This while many MIT professors who are not Institute Professors have Wikipedia articles and are universally considered notable (and so do most of the Institute Professors). Please opine at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute Professor. Your input is needed! Michael Hardy 00:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
