User:Mkhan32/Mechanistic Empirical Design of Highways
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Mechanistic-empirical design is a method of designing highway pavements. It combines empirical relationships obtained from the field data with theoretical predictions based on the mechanics of materials. This method relates inputs such as traffic, loadings, soil strenght, climate, etc. to the actual pavement response. Currently, the pavement design method being used by most highway authorities is Empirical Design. In Empirical Design, the pavement is designed based on data obtained from the field only. Mechanistic-empirical method is more accurate than the empirical method because the empirical method only relies on the field performance , while the mechanistic-empirical method combines both the field performance and theoretical prediction models. It is important to adopt Mechanistic-based pavement design procedure because it employs more efficient and sophisticated analytical tools and structural analysis models.
[edit] Mechanistic-Empirical Design
Proceudre
Mechanistic-Empirical design procedure involves three main steps. In the first step, pavement response values are obtained in the field or in a laboratory test. In the second step, theoretical values of pavement response are calculated using mechanics. Then finally, the data obtained from the field and laboratory tests is related to the predicted pavement response by using advanced structural models. The structural models are based on an analysis method caled finite elemt analysis. If the pavement response predicted by models does not match the observed pavement distress , shift factors are used to adjust predicted pavement performance to match the field-observed pavement performance. Thus, confidence and improved reliability are developed in the Mechanistic-Empirical procedure.
Why Mechanistic-Empirical Approach is Needed
It is important to adopt Mechanistic-based pavement design procedure because it employs more efficient and sophisticated analytical tools and structural analysis models. It has been concluded that the currently available flexible pavement structural models and computer codes for mechanistic analysis are adequate for Mechanistic-Empirical thickness design procedures. Dependence on observed performance is necessary because theory alone has not proven to be sufficient to design pavements realistically. Mechanistic methods rely on the scientist’s ability to translate the analytical calculations obtained by structural analysis of pavement response to performance data. This results in a more relaible pavement design and improves the long-term performance of highways.
[edit] Issues and Challenges
There are still a few challenges in adopting the mechanistic-based approach. Distress models are the weak point in the M-E design. Extensive field calibration and verification are required to establish reliable distress prediction models, something that is not easy to achieve. A major credibility gap in M-E design procedures is the large magnitude of the shift factors between predicted and observed pavement distress and performance. Another complicating factor is the adequacy and accuracy of the input traffic data. The procedures used to estimate historic traffic data do not reflect a consistent methodology or procedure. Also, one of the major issues is the need for financial resources to fully implement the M-E design procedure. Most state highway authorities at this time do not have the necessary personnel, time, and financial resources to support a large-scale M-E implementation program. The state highway authorities, at the same time, do not have adequate available flexible pavement data and information to support M-E verification and calibration activities. Most state authorities think that the current M-E procedures are very sophisticated and complex and that they would rather have a more simplified procedure for the more common design condtions.
