Talk:Mother
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 July 2006. The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. |
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. But until someone else deletes or (somehow) encyclopedifies this article, it might as well be accurate. - user:Montrealais
- Indeed. Vicki Rosenzweig
Contents |
[edit] Profanity edit
Removed references to 'motherfucker' and 'MILF'. These have no place here.
[edit] Proposed move
motherhood to mother. To make consistent with the title of the father article. 64.193.70.223 21:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Georgia guy 23:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Please remove the template above if you fulfill a move request. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 18:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- This article is currently a long definition resembling a dictionary entry, with some questionable content (eg: comment about status of mothers in Romania). Why do we need it? Exploding Boy 05:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
I also think the comment about the status of mothers in Romania is out of place. Moreover, such a comment would need to be backed up by a reference in my opinion. Better, I would suggest to remove the comment altogether.
Yes. 149.225.214.24 19:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Follow Father Page
There are, as with fathers, different types of mother, are ther not, therefore, we should include them? feedback what you think. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Umpajug (talk • contribs) 14:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC).
- You may wish to elaborate SamanthaG 01:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Use of "mom/mommy" in British Midlands
This was deleted by user 86.146.203.197 on Valentine's Day. Why it was deleted is unclear, but usage of the above is widespread if not total throughout the West Midlands (specifically the Black Country and Birmingham). I have put this information back in, for now. If anyone has an objection, please let me know. Worley-d 22:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
-- In addition, the amount of vandalism on this page is alarming. I assume it is due to the low standard of the article that it is not protected against such anonymous edits? It seems like this page has had ten edits since my last constructive edit, all adding and then correcting said vandalism. Worley-d 19:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
