Talk:Muv-Luv
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Muv-Luv is part of WikiProject Visual novels, a project to improve all visual novel-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other visual novel-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
Muv-Luv is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of anime and manga. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page (Talk). See our portal to learn more. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Disambiguation
I'm against it. How'd you split it up, anyway? Extra and Unlimited are part of the same game, and Alternative is too closely linked to Unlimited. Omgwtflolz 16:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Since there aren't any objections, I'll just go remove that thing. Omgwtflolz 18:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Charcater details are big spoilers.
You should really consider removing the details about the characters. Especially Sumika Kagami and 00-Unit are huge spoilers first revealed a good way in the final game. Having those later in the article might be alright since it's a warning there.
- "...Wikipedia, which strives first to inform, spoilers or not..." Omgwtflolz 11:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] removed interwiki link
At the bottom of the article, there were two interwiki links: ja:マブラヴ and ja:マブラヴ オルタネイティヴ. I removed the latter because you should only link to one page for a given language. Otherwise, it's confusing... in the "other languages" section (on the sidebar in the default Monobook skin), it says this: "日本語 日本語"—and there's nothing to differentiate the two links (other than mousing over the link to see where it goes, but not everybody is that web-savvy). That's bad. So you need to decide which link is better to keep. I decided to keep ja:マブラヴ because it looks like it's the main article, but of course you can keep the other one instead if there's a compelling argument to do so. - furrykef (Talk at me) 00:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Each article is about a game, and this article covers each heavily. Both links should be kept. There is no "main" article. Omgwtflolz 09:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- But the way the two links appear is unacceptable. Consider this sentence: "You can view this page in Japanese or in Japanese." Does that make any sense to you? Does the sentence provide any indication that the two pages "in Japanese" are different? But that's the way the links appear when you have both of them. It's just not acceptable. You have to find some other solution, like splitting this page into two and having each link to its corresponding Japanese article. That's what I'm inclined to do. - furrykef (Talk at me) 23:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Article Cleanup
this article is writen in a very confusing way. Is missing the synopsis for the original game (muv-luv) and it's heavily concentrated on the character description. Also, some frases like "brain in a tube" such like to describe a character are not proper for wikipedia. Overall, please do not remove the "article cleanup" tag and contribute.
Thank you Minako-Chan* 22:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
