Talk:Naïve empiricism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I would appreciate seeing the names, and preferably links to, the leading proponents of both the strong and weak (the piece by Jose is insufficient) versions of the naive empiricist school of thought.
[edit] The Naïve empiricism page, unfortunately, is in complete error
Naïve empiricism is original research, POV and completely made up by the original editors of the article. Sorry to break the news. Possibly the original editor(s) were confusing empiricism with naive falsification, a concept of the empirical method. Possibly they were referring to some extremely obscure and long obsolete uses of the term from the 19th Century. The arguments "for" and "against" it were essentially conjured up without any reasonable sourcing or other research. Most of the first paragraph was internally contradictory. Therefore, I will now remove most of its content...Kenosis 22:29, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
