User talk:NeantHumain
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
hi -- can I ask where you're getting your material from? at least some of it appears to be from www.psychnet-uk.com, e.g., masochistic. do you know what the copyright status of these documents are? they appears to be copyrighted by psychnet-uk.com, but I'm not sure. check WP:C for information on what wikipedia can accept; if these are copyrighted, we can't use them. thanks. bikeable (talk) 22:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I wasn't questioning whether the articles should be included, but I was wondering where the text came from specifically. I had thought that you were copying and pasting from psychnet-uk.com -- I found that site by googling blocks of text, not just the names. However, the text is identical with that at ptypes.com, which raises the same question. Does the text itself come from the DSM-3 (as ptypes.com implies?). If so, does the APA hold copyright? I'm a bit confused by that since your new page says the term was "never formally admitted" to the DSM, but it does look like that's where the text is coming from. Even the ptypes.com page has a copyright notice on the bottom, so if the text is copyrighted either by ptypes.com or by the APA, we may not be able to use it. thanks again. (Also, I note that the link on Self-defeating personality disorder points to the ptypes page on the sadistic disorder.) bikeable (talk) 23:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- I consider the copying of DSM disorder criteria lists to my own website a matter of w:Fair use. There has been an abundant use of DSM material on the web since I started in 1998, and I've never seen or heard of the APA objecting to it. Ptypes 23:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Psychopathy
PLEASE bring all your objective information back often to help craft a truly great article. You obviously know, and have studied SO much.
I have a lot of opinions and subjective ideas of my own (and the scars to show where they came from), it's really hard to keep it balanced and objective but the knowledge and the information is the important thing.
I have opened a pseudopsychopathic personality disorder article with a redirect and hope to get time to help make it a real article sooner rather than later. Having known two people with frontal lobe damage (and some seriously psychopathic attitudes) I found this new (to me) concept worth a fascinating "google" today --Zeraeph 15:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dia Duit
Hi there! If you're ever short of a few subjects to do, we'd be more than happy to see you at Wikipedia:Irish Wikipedians' notice board. There's not that many of us, and we need all the help and opinions we can get. Cheers!Fergananim 21:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] On Petronix and Sociopathic.net
How can you know that that the guy who calls himself Petronix is foctional? Please email me: happyjon at gmail dot com
[edit] Category:Aspergian Wikipedians
Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] psychopathy vs sociopathy
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I agree with you fully that the confusion between psychopaths and sociopaths is an important issue. I did not remove the Lykken paragraph, and the person who did has put it back. My whole purpose in the reorganization edit was to make clear the distinctions between psychopathy, sociopathy and APD. Besides, the article needed a little shake-up in the middle IMHO. I think where the article is now, it makes it more clear. Although a lot of what I wrote was edited out, it was written with the 'distinguishable' issue in mind. Finally, I want to make clear that I wish to contribute to the article because it is an important topic, which to me implies working with those who have already put in a lot of effort. I respect the work that you and the other editors have put into the article already.
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icarus Project
Thank you for your comments about the Icarus Project article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icarus Project. I added some references which I think are enough to establish notability, although the article clearly still has problems. --Eastmain 06:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Premorbid personality
Brilliant. Thank you v much. Please would you put it into context for a patient suffering from Parkinson's disease and Clinical depression. - Kittybrewster 05:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Message
I got a message from you on my talk page about the personality disorders list. I don't think it was intended for me. Please let me know if I am wrong. Otherwise, OK if I delete it?Shelbing 06:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
