Talk:Nebraska Man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The "Evolution Cruncher" is not an authoritative source for information on academic/scientific topics. Of all the available sources on this mistake, I don't see any reason to reference a book full of patent nonsense.
[edit] AiG
Is the AiG link really necessary? It basically just expounds upon the falsities already debunked in the main Wikipedia article. I'm removing it; if anyone has a good idea why it should stay, bring it up here. --Cyde Weys 00:33, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
It's being fair. You would have no objection to the truths in the main Wikipedia article being repeated and expounded upon elsewhere (as indeed they are). Let people decide for themselves.
[edit] Drawings
The two drawings published in Illustrated London News on June 24, 1922 should be shown here. Nebraska man's tooth Drawings and Nebraska Man illustration of two humanlike creatures I hope those drawings is not copyrighted. --OnlyHuman 13:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
