Talk:No Logo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
Contents |
[edit] removed link
* Nike's response to No Logo - http://www.nikebiz.com/labor/nologo_let.shtml
I have removed this link as it does not seem to work any longer. user:Montrealais 12 September 2002
- Have browsed Nike's new site, couldn't find it anywhere. Frank Quist 24 March 2003
[edit] See also: UPS
UPS is listed in the see also section goes to a disambiguation page. It should go to the topic intended instead, but I'm not entirely certain what the original intent was. --68.198.246.166 11:15, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Official FAQ
"These ironies have not escaped critics or even the webmasters of the No Logo franchise (who addressed it on their FAQ page)". Actually they don't mention it in their FAQ page, or i am missing something? Benceno 01:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Weak article
This article is very weak. Although I suppose this book is now out of date on many specifics, I would say it should be rated a high "importance" level for its relevance (or the relevance it was seen to have) at the time. It was certainly considered by the mainstream press to define the anti-corporate/anti-globalisation movement, such as a defined movement actually exists. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.150.161.39 (talk • contribs) 1 February 2007.
