Talk:Northern California
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Archive
Archive discussion August 2006 and earlier
[edit] Fresno Removal
I don't think anyone north of Los Angeles would consider Fresno in Northern California. It is always referred to as Central California or Central Valley. I would propose removing references to Fresno from this article. Tenacioust 22:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it all depends on how many sections you're dividing the state into. If you're dividing the state into only two sections, then Fresno is definitely considered more "northern" than "southern." If you're dividing the state into three or four sections, then Fresno would belong in Central or Central Valley. However, as I'm reading this article, the focus is on a two-part division of the state - so Fresno is appropriately in this article. NorCalHistory 22:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Auburn, Placerville, and Eureka? Major Cities?
These cities are questionably major as far as my understanding. I believe they are all county seats but they seem out of place in my opinion. I would consider a either city with a population over 100,000 or a that is the primary in a metropolitan area at the very least to be a major city. Does any one else agree?
[edit] Stan State
I'm curious as to why Cal State Stanislaus in Turlock is not included in the list of CSU's, considering schools much farther south (UC Merced, CSU Fresno) make the cut. If there's no opposition, I'll modify the page and add this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arden (talk • contribs) 07:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
[edit] WikiProject Rating
Definitely not a "stub," I believe it means at least the B quality, and is at the upper end of that range. NorCalHistory 05:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)