Novial

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Novial
Flag:
Created by:	Otto Jespersen	1928
Setting and usage:	international auxiliary language
Total speakers:	—
Category (purpose):	constructed language international auxiliary language Novial
Category (sources):	Romance and Germanic languages; also Occidental and Ido
Language codes
ISO 639-1:	none
ISO 639-2:	`art`
ISO 639-3:	`nov`
Note: This page may contain IPA phonetic symbols in Unicode. See IPA chart for English for an English-based pronunciation key.

Novial [nov- ("new") + IAL, International Auxiliary Language] is a constructed international auxiliary language (IAL) intended to facilitate international communication and friendship, without displacing anyone's native language. It was devised by Professor Otto Jespersen, a Danish linguist who was previously involved in the Ido movement, and subsequently in the development of Interlingua.

Its vocabulary is based largely on the Germanic and Romance languages and its grammar is influenced by English.

Novial was first introduced in Jespersen's book An International Language in 1928. It was updated in his dictionary, Novial Lexike, published two years later and further modifications were proposed in the 1930s, but the language became dormant with Jespersen's death in 1943. In the 1990s, with the revival of interest in artificial languages brought on by the Internet, many people rediscovered Novial.

1 An International Language
2 Pronunciation
3 Grammar
4 Vocabulary
- 4.1 Affixes
5 Novial compared to Esperanto and Ido
6 Sample text (The Lord's Prayer)
7 See also
8 External links

[edit] An International Language

Novial was first described in Jespersen’s book An International Language (1928). Part One of the book discusses the need for an IAL, the disadvantages of ethnic languages for that purpose, and common objections to constructed IALs. He also provides a critical overview of the history of constructed IALs with sections devoted to Volapük, Esperanto, Idiom Neutral, Ido, Latino sine Flexione and Occidental (Interlingue). The author makes it clear that he draws on a wealth of earlier work on the problem of a constructed IAL, not only the aforementioned IALs.

Part Two of An International Language describes Novial in detail. Alternative possible solutions for problems in the phonology, orthography, grammar and word-stock are considered. The choices made are explained by comparison with ethnic languages and previously constructed IALs.

[edit] Pronunciation

See the Pronunciation Guide of the Novial Wikibook.

[edit] Grammar

[edit] Personal pronouns, subject and object

The personal pronouns are:

me – "I, me"
nus – "we, us"
vu – "you" singluar
vus – "you" plural
lo – "he", "him"
los – "they", "them" (all male)
la – "she", "her"
las – "they", "them" (all female)
le – "he" or "she" or "it", "him" or "her" or "it"
les – "they", "them"
lu or lum – "it"
lus or lumes – "they, them" (all sexless objects)

The impersonal pronoun ”one, they, you” is on.

The standard word order is, as in English, subject-verb-object, so the object need not be marked to distinguish it from the subject:

me observa vu – "I observe you"
vu observa me – "you observe me"

The accusative (direct object) is therefore generally identical to the nominative (subject).

An optional accusative ending -m (-em after a consonant) is available but is rarely used. The preposition em is equivalent to this ending.

The personal possessive adjectives are formed from the pronouns by adding -n or after a consonant -en. This is in fact the genitive (possessive) of the pronoun so men means both "my" and "mine" ("of me"):

le es men hunde – it is my dog
le es men – it is mine

men – "my; "mine"
nusen – "our"; "ours"
vun – "your"; "yours"
vusen – "your"; "yours" (more than one person)
lon – "his"
losen – "their"; "theirs" (all male)
lan – "her"; "hers"
lasen – "their"; "theirs" (all female)
len – "his", "her" or "its"; "his" or "hers"
lesen – "their"; "theirs"
lun – "its"
lusen – "their"; "theirs" (all sexless objects)

Possession may also be expressed with the pronoun de: de me, de vu, and so on.

[edit] Verbs

Verb forms never change with person or number. Most verb tenses, moods and voices are expressed with auxiliary verbs preceding the root form of the main verb. The auxiliaries follow the same word order as the English equivalent.

Infinitive: protekte – "to protect"
Present: me protekte – "I protect"
Simple past: me did protekte (= me protekted) – "I protected"
Present perfect: me ha protekte – "I have protected"
Past perfect: me had protekte – "I had protected"
Future: me sal protekte – "I shall protect"
Future perfect: me sal ha protekte – "I shall have protected"
Future in the past: me saled protekte – "I was going to protect"
Conditional: me vud protekte – "I would protect"
Conditional perfect: me vud ha protekte – "I would have protected"
First imperative: let nus protekte! – "Let us protect!"
Second imperative: protekte! – "Protect!"
Third imperative: let lo protekte! – "let him protect!"

Present active participle: protektent – "protecting"
Past passive participle: protektet – "protected"

Novial clearly distinguishes the passive of becoming and the passive of being. In English the forms are often the same, using the auxiliary verb to be followed by the past participle. However, the passive of becoming is also often expessed with the verb to get which is used in the examples below.

The passive voice of becoming is formed with the auxiliary bli followed by the root verb form.

Infinitive: bli protekte – "to get protected (come under protection)"
Present: me bli protekte – "I get protected"
Simple past: me blid protekte – "I got protected"
Present perfect: me ha bli protekte – "I have got protected"
Past perfect: me had bli protekte – "I had got protected"
Future: me sal bli protekte – "I shall get protected"
Future perfect: me sal ha bli protekte – "I shall have got protected"
Future in the past: me saled bli protekte – "I was going to get protected"
Conditional: me vud bli protekte – "I would get protected"
Conditional perfect: me vud ha bli protekte – "I would have got protected"
First imperative: let nus bli protekte! – "let us get protected!"
Second imperative: bli protekte! – "get protected!"
Third imperative: let lo bli protekte! – "let him get protected!"

The passive voice of being is formed with the auxiliary es followed by the past passive participle.

Infinitive: es protektet – "to be protected (be under protection)"
Present: me es protektet – "I am protected"
Simple past: me did es protektet (= me esed protektet) – "I was protected"
Present perfect: me ha es protektet – "I have been protected"
Past perfect: me had es protektet – "I had been protected"
Future: me sal es protektet – "I shall be protected"
Future perfect: me sal ha es protektet – "I shall have been protected"
Future in the past: me saled es protektet – "I shall be protected"
Conditional: me vud es protektet – "I would be protected"
Conditional perfect: me vud ha es protektet – "I would have been protected"
First imperative: let nus es protektet! – "Let us be protected!"
Second imperative: es protektet! – "be protected!"
Third imperative: let lo es protektet! – "let him be protected!"

[edit] Articles

The definite article is li which is invariant. It is used as in English.

There is no indefinite article.

[edit] Nouns

The plural noun is formed by adding –s to the singular (-es after a consonant).

The accusative case is generally identical to the nominative but can optionally be marked with the ending -m (pl. -sem) (-em after a consonant; pl. -esem) or with the preposition em.

The genitive is formed with the preposition de or with the ending -n (-en after a consonant). The plural of this case is -sen (-esen after a consonant).

Other cases are formed with prepositions preceding the root form.

[edit] Adjectives

All adjectives end in -i which may be dropped if easy to pronounce. Adjectives generally precede the noun qualified but optionally may follow the noun. Adjectives do not agree with the noun.

[edit] Adverbs

An adjective is converted to a corresponding adverb by adding -m after the -i ending of the adjective.

[edit] Vocabulary

[edit] Affixes

See the Table of Prefixes and Table of Suffixes at the Novial Wikibook.

[edit] Novial compared to Esperanto and Ido

Main article: Esperanto and Novial compared

Jespersen was a professional linguist, unlike Esperanto's creator. He disliked the arbitrary and artificial character that he found in Esperanto and Ido. Additionally, he objected to those languages' Latin-like systems of inflection, which he found needlessly complex. He sought to make Novial at once euphonious and regular while also preserving useful structures from natural languages.

In Novial:

Syntax is largely a matter of word order, as in English and modern Scandinavian languages. There is no obligatory accusative marker as in Esperanto, but the accusative may optionally be marked with either an accusative ending or an accusative preposition.
A genitive or possessive case is available as an alternative to the preposition de. This is based on Jespersen's observation that many modern languages have lost complex noun inflections, yet retain a possessive form.
Auxiliary particles express most verb tenses. An inflectional ending is available as a shorthand for the simple past tense.

A major difference between Novial and Esperanto/Ido concerns noun endings. Jespersen rejected a single vowel to terminate all nouns (-o in Esperanto/Ido), finding it unnatural and potentially confusing. Instead, Novial nouns may end in -o, -a, -e, or -u or -um. These endings may be taken to indicate natural sex according to the custom in Romance languages. Also there is no grammatical gender or requirement for adjectives to agree with nouns.

[edit] Sample text (The Lord's Prayer)

Nusen Patro kel es in siele,
mey vun nome bli sanktifika,
mey vun regno veni,
mey vun volio eventa sur tere kom in siele.
Dona a nus disidi li omnidiali pane,
e pardona a nus nusen ofensos
kom anke nus pardona a nusen ofensantes,
e non dukte nus en li tento
ma fika nus liberi fro li malum.