User talk:Nscheffey/Archive 5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Contents |
October 2006
Make it work
Just to let you know, the lack of effort you used in keeping your new page was not truly the way to go about creating a relationship with a page of such intrest. I see how you want the page to remain usable but i suggest putting more time into making it a strong article. Make it work. It wants to work.sjh.24.176.69.100 20:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Three Kings (film) GA Nomination
Just a heads-up. I put the nomination on hold and left some notes on its talk page of things to add to it. Cbrown1023 00:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, you are completely right about the glaring ommission of a Reception section. I knew this, and had listed it on the talk page under ToDo. Working on it now. By the way, if you dont mind, do you have any other suggestions? Is this getting anywhere near FA? I've never really been through the process. Thanks again, —Nate Scheffey 00:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- As for nearing FA-quality, I would probably have to say no. For a show of what types of information FA-class articles about films should have, you should look at the articles in Category:FA-Class film articles. One other thing you could possibly do to expand the article: Add some more images (this may not be a necessity and may be hard to do). The only other thing to do would be to look at FA film articles (as stated above) to get ideas for other sections that you may want to include (becuase FA articles are not just the bare bones, they are in-depth and include many different topics related to the film). If you have any further questions, you can contact me on my talk page. Cbrown1023 00:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
arbitration
Hi, since you were involved with this case at the Administrators'_noticeboard, I would very much appreciate your input at my case at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Harrassment.2C_talk_page_vandalism.2C_and_non-consensus_changes_to_guideline. Thanks! Fresheneesz 04:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Sandwich
You had nominated the image that was in the article for deletion. I wanted to have an image in the article so I knew of this one (since I created it) and used it. I deleted Image:Sandwich.JPG. -Nv8200p talk 02:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ahhh, I see. The image I nominated for deletion was being constantly reinserted into the article by anons, and it must have gotten reinserted right before you deleted it. I think Image:Italian_Sandwich.jpeg is a very attractive and non-restaurant specific choice, and am going to change it back to that if you don't object. Happy editing. —Nate Scheffey 02:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Three Kings (movie) Barlow post-torture.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Three Kings (movie) Barlow post-torture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Newsletter
The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Newsletter
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
WP:Films Newsletter
The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Breezy Poster.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Breezy Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
