Talk:OLAF
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Erik,
I have no objections. But it is also good practice to call the readers' attention to a potential violation of the Wikipedia standards of Neutrality. You have to agree that it is obvious that undue weight is given to one specific topic: There is no paragraph longer than the one on Mr Tillack...
My suggestion: Explain the entire thing in all detail under the entry Hans-Martin Tillack and keep only a short summary here. After all, it is only this case how Hans-Martin Tillack has become world famous (and therefore worthy of his own Wikipedia entry).
James
---
James Blunt, I think it is inappropriate that a contrubutor calls for revision before any discussion has taken place. Particularily if the contributor is anonymous, as you are. That is why I have moved your complaint to this discussion page.
Best regards,
Erik Josefsson
After recent changes parts of this article do not fulfill the Wikipedia standards of Neutrality (Neutral point of view) any more. A user added more and more elements under section Cases in order to give undue weight to one single topic - the one of Hans-Martin Tillack. Furthermore, the user favoured his point of view in a partial manner and, on the other hand, deleted elements favourable to OLAF. It seems very strongly that that the interested person himself has changed the entry. --James Blunt 14:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)