User talk:Pandacomics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Taiwan is INDEPENDANT and is not associated with the ROC. Are you racist?

(user's note: I actually didn't write the above statement. This was left by IP user 218.254.252.143.)

My stance on Taiwan: the post-WWII treaties state that the Island of Taiwan would be returned to the Republic of China, which, at the time, was China Proper (i.e. the big China). Then the Communists won, and they became China Proper. The land given to the Republic of China would have remained with the Communists if they kept the name "Republic of China," but instead, they became the "People's Republic of China." As we know, the text in the Potsdam, etc. treaties remain unrevised, and still say that Japan would have to return land to the Republic of China. -Pandacomics 00:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Note how I didn't mention the word "independent" or the phrase "Taiwan belongs to China"

Although Taiwan has their own government elected by their own people, passport, flag, envious educational system, etc. BUT there are only 24 nations in this world recognize Taiwan as a country - the nations doesn't include superpowers like US or the UK. Where are the rest? I have to say that I support the reunification of One China EricOng 09:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah... I don't like at all the fact that the PRC and Taiwan are split. Some Taiwanese people are ridiculously rejecting the fact that they do not have Chinese origins, and would rather have Japanese heritage other than Chinese. The Simplified and Traditional Chinese thing is something I would not quit on because unification is my goal. I really do hope some day The People's Republic of China and the Republic of China would be combined into one. You don't get it? You don't have to. ReGoG Now 23:11 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Disagreeing with your political views does not make someone a racist. BuyAMountain 00:05, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I apologize for my own misunderstanding. I should have read your page more carefully. BuyAMountain 00:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

1 Misunderstanding
2 5566
3 S.H.E
4 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Reachingforthestars.jpg)
5 Orphaned fair use image (Image:Littlefairyost.jpg)
6 Thank you
7 Zhu Da
8 Vandals
9 Notability of I.n.g
10 Article about Kurów on Mandarin language

[edit] Misunderstanding

I didn't write that statement. It was someone that written it and didn't signed it. I was on the same stand as you. EricOng 12:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 5566

I'll try my best on the albums. However, I'd appreciate it if you could help me on the images. Ytlow 09:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] S.H.E

alrighty. mirageinred 05:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for all the effort for the S.H.E article. EricOng 09:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Reachingforthestars.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Reachingforthestars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Littlefairyost.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Littlefairyost.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

[edit] Thank you

Thank you for your help on Political status of Taiwan. Keep up the good work! --Ideogram 00:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zhu Da

I do not really have a clear picture of it, but according to what I have observed, here are my two cents worth. If you have observed properly, all track 1 in every single S.H.E album is considered as their zhu da. In the contrary, Jay Chou has Qian Li Zhi Wai (track 3) as his Still Fantasy zhu da. To my explanation, a song that will be normally considered as a hit or a song that represents the album that will be played frequently in music stores/widely recognized. For example, Bu Xiang Zhang Da and Super Star which are widely populated. Bo Si Mao IS a zhu da too for their 6th album considering that I do not really like that song.

Basically, there are always "di er zhu da ge" which means second zhu da. Ring Ring Ring, Beauty Up My Life are widely accepted as their second zhu da ge. If you had observed properly, you would normally find track 2 of their songs in an album a second zhu da ge. As for their second album, Youth Society, Re Dai Yu Lin is widely recognized partly because it was composed by Jay Chou? In addition, Wo Ai Ni in their Encore album could be possibly considered as their second zhu da for Encore. Perhaps you can add me in MSN. EricOng 07:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandals

They're hopelessly outnumbered. :) - Denny 06:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of I.n.g

A tag has been placed on I.n.g, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — ERcheck (talk) 21:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article about Kurów on Mandarin language

Could you please write a stub about Kurów here - just a few sentences based on http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BA%93%E9%B2%81%E5%A4%AB%E5%B8%82 or EN wiki ? Only 3-5 sentences enough. Please.

PS. Article about Kurów is already on 155 languages. If you do that, please put interwiki link into English version. If your village/town/city hasn't on PL wiki, I can do article about it. Pietras1988 ^TALK 18:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/a/n/User_talk%7EPandacomics_b627.html"