Talk:Parliamentary Private Secretary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Parliamentary Private Secretary was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake.
Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}} |
I have renovated and furnished the article, unfortunately it logged me out while I was doing it so I don't think it saved my signature, for anyone who wants to know who worked on it Douglike 11:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Failed GA
I've regettably failed the article as a Good Article candidate. My concerns are basically as follows:
- The article is too brief. It needs significantly more content and analysis of the role. Everything there is basically right (and, just as importantly, sourced) but I am convinced more can be said.
- In general, the paragraphs are very short - if more material can be added then this stylistic point will be easy to address.
- Some images would be nice.
Regards, The Land 16:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
