Wikipedia talk:Paris is in France
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] A talkpage without discussion? And it's not policy?
Time to be WP:BOLD Ronbo76 15:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Examples of Paris not being in France
Please see Paris (disambiguation) for other places named Paris that are not in France. Ronbo76 16:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Seems a perfect example of Sturgeon's Law, which states, Nothing is always absolutely so. Needs to be incorporated into essay. Ronbo76 20:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Suggested improvements for this essay
Now that wikilinks have been provided, how can this essay be improved? Be WP:BOLD! Ronbo76 16:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- POV statement about impoverished should be removed. Ronbo76 18:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- No section outlining a contrary opinion that provides a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting views. Ronbo76 20:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Don't be dense. If people abided by this, other policies would flow naturally and be intuitive. Seems like a start. Ronbo76 02:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Impoverished should be removed removed too unless properly sourced. Non-need context that is a POV comment. Ronbo76 02:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Modeled after long-standing essay page
I very intentionally used the same terminology, amount of wikilinks, and notability level of the example that I found in the almost year-old essay Wikipedia:The Pope is Catholic. I reasoned that if it has been around that long, there is some level of consensus that that essay is a good guideline in those areas. 76.22.4.86 20:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shortcut should probably read Wikipedia:Paris vs WP:Paris
Saw this in one of my watched article (mostly likely the Village Pump). If this article has not had proper or formal review at some level, it is not at the WP level. Ronbo76 19:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Cross check w/ VP etal.
