Talk:Patrick Gordon Walker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Patrick Gordon Walker was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake.
Date of review: 2007-02-04 |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage. | ||
needs references, and a picture - submit to WP:Biography for Peer Review for more detailed suggestions. Mocko13 02:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- It is well written.
- a (prose):
b (structure): 
c (MoS): d (jargon):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (inline citations): c (reliable):
d (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
I think this article has potential, but references (using footnotes especially) are needed. Also, it's needs proofreading.--Macca7174 19:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
